Friday, April 08, 2005

Movie Review: Saw (Spoiler)

I saw the movie Saw last night. I'd heard a number of mixed things about it. It seems to be the type of movie you either love or hate.

Usually I end up disliking movies when I hear a lot of good things about them. I guess hype surrounding a movie (or anything else for that matter) tends to make me more skeptical about it.

In this case, I knew that it was a low-budget movie and the first movie made by both the writer and director. Where a lot of negative reviews pointed out the many flaws with the movie, I was really surprised at how good it was for a low-budget flick. Sure there were a lot of things wrong with it, but overall, I enjoyed it. (Okay, 'enjoyed' may sound a little perverse given the subject matter.)

When it comes to any kind of entertainment, how I rate something comes down to three things:
  1. The 'escape' value. Something with a high escape value will find me losing track of time while something with a low value will have me looking at the time. Basically, how well does it keep my attention.
  2. Did I walk away with something? Did it make me think, evoke emotions (even if it's something as simple as genuine laughter) or leave me questioning my feelings and opinions about something?
  3. Will I remember it? This is really tied in closely with #2. But there are many books, movies and tv shows that I didn't really walk away with anything from, yet I remembered it for some reason.

In all 3 cases, "Saw" came out on top for me.

I know that many who have seen the movie, didn't like the ending because it left so many unanswered questions. The top two being: do Adam and Lawrence survive? Given the number of discussions I've seen online about this, I wanted to share my two cents.

We know that Jigsaw's 'game' is about getting people to prove what life means to them by their being able to complete tests. We know that it is possible to win his tests and survival is a possible outcome because Amanda passed her test and lived. We also know that Jigsaw really thought things through carefully.

So, if you take the survival of Adam and Lawrence on the basis that they would each win or die depending on whether they passed or failed their tests, it makes things a lot easier.

Lawrence obviously failed. He missed his 6 o'clock deadline for killing Adam. Amputating his foot as he did, with the resulting blood loss, it's hard to imagine that survival was even a remote possibility. I can't imagine how Lawrence could have survived. He shouldn't have according to Jigsaw's rules.

Adam is another story. He was not given as straightforward a test as the others. Adam had been a voyeur into others people's lives and neglecting his own. Jigsaw wanted him to learn to appreciate the value of his own life.

I've read the opinions of a number of people that Adam still had a final test: to get the key out of the drain. However, before Jigsaw leaves the washroom, he tells Adam, "Game over." In saying this, I believe that Jigsaw is telling Adam that he won.

Many people also seem to believe that Adam's survival is contingent on him being able to somehow obtain the key and undo the lock holding his chains. I don't think that is even necessary. He's only been locked in the washroom for a matter of 6-7 hours. He could easily survive there for days. We saw that the video was set up in the doctor's home showing the washroom. Lawrence's wife will be able to tell the police about the cell phone call. The cell phone is in the washroom. Presumably, even without someone answering the phone, eventually, by continually ringing it, they'd be able to track it down. If Lawrence was able to get partway out of where they were hidden, I'm sure that would make it easier to find Adam.

The only way I can imagine that Adam would not survive until help came would be if he somehow killed himself. I doubt that would happen because he's already shown he wants to live.

So, I think the death of Lawrence and eventual survival of Adam are inevitable.

A couple of things I think were interesting in the movie that I wish had been better explored or explained:

It seems like Lawrence was a target of Jigsaw's from the beginning. Lawrence was framed to look like he was Jigsaw. But more than that - we know that the police raid on Jigsaw's hideout happened 6 months before Lawrence's kidnapping. Yet in Jigsaw's hideout, there was a model of the washroom that Lawrence and Adam were held captive in.

Other than being Jigsaw's doctor, what was Jigsaw's real issue with Lawrence? It seems like there was more to this than Lawrence being a simple victim.

Also, the issue of Jigsaw's tumor... coincidentally I am finishing reading Michael Crichton's "The Terminal Man." In this book, the main character suffers from a flaw in his brain that results in seizures that precipitate increasingly violent behavior. Doctors within the book say they have reason to believe that physical deformities of the brain often are the cause of psychotic or extreme criminal behavior. Seeing "Saw" so close to reading this book made it a little easier for me grasp the idea that a tumour could, in fact, result in homidical/psychopathic behavior.

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

Excuses and the trouble with quitting

From the time I started on my previous post until about an hour ago, I didn't smoke. Granted, I was asleep half of the time. But I did manage not to smoke for about 5 hours of being awake. Then I got up after napping and boom...the little nicodemon got me yet again.

I think that part of my problem right now is that my smoking is only having minor affects on me healthwise. I haven't had to use my daily asthma inhaler in over 3 months now. I haven't had an actual asthma attack this year. (Removing most carpeting from my house in the fall seemed to really help.) My coughing isn't bad and it doesn't wake me up.

So the little nicodemon is playing mind games with me. As much as I want to stop and I know the damage, the signs of it killing me right now aren't staring me in the face.

This will sound awful but if I were sick right now, this would be so much easier.

There's a great site that gives a little too much of a reality dose of what smoking does to you. The pictures and stories there look almost staged they are that gruesome. If that is what smoking does to you, then why don't they show us stories and pictures like this ("they" being everyone that says we need to quit). Sure, there are a lot of PSA's that tell us we shouldn't smoke, that smoking causes health issues, etc... but why not just put it right in our faces. They do that to some extent with cigarette packages here in Canada with the gruesome pictures. But that doesn't do it. Seeing the savage effects of cancer and knowing the personal story of a whole person humanizes it. It makes it more real. The pictures on the cigarette packages of someone's mouth or a cancerous lung... what exactly is that supposed to do?

Part of my fear right now is wondering right now if it is already too late. Do I have cancerous cells already growing in my body somewhere? I've already stared two types of cancer in the face myself - skin cancer and cervical cancer. Obviously that wasn't enough encouragement or enough of a scare for me to quit.

I know that even if I already have precancerous cells, chances are that if I quit before they actually become cancerous, with the wonders of how the body works - I'll be okay.

I hate that I smoke. I hate the hold that cigarettes have over me. Even after so many years of being a smoker (21 versus 16 of not smoking), I don't see myself as a smoker.

Sigh.

If you've ever smoked or you might smoke now.. you might know the panic or anxiety that comes with running low on cigarettes. I buy cigarettes by the carton. I never let myself go down to less than 2 packs and here I am with one pack on hand. The weather is nice, so I can just take a walk to the store to get some if I run out.

The way smoking preoccupies the thoughts of smokers - especially those of us who really want to quit - is sad. So much time, energy and thought wasted on such a stupid stupid habit.

Part of me feels like I need a game plan. I make plans - lists - everyone that knows me well jokes about how anal I am about making lists. They tend to work for me. In this case, I've tried the lists and plans before and they haven't worked.

Am I just making a bigger deal out of this than it needs to be? If I quit cold turkey, I'll have a few rough days and then it will get easier as long as I take it minute by minute.

My doctor gave me a prescription for Elavin - a mild dose - and told me to take that before going to bed and do a combination of patch and gum. The Elavin is supposed to help with me sleeping. When I've used the patch before, it worked well for me except that I had wild dreams if I wore it when sleeping. I also had problems with getting pains in my arms if I didn't rotate them enough. My first experience with the patch stopped when I started to get nose bleeds. That was scary! My doctor at the time (different one than this one) thought it was because I was getting in too much nicotine.

I guess what I'm getting at here is that it's hard for me to make a plan because I can't predict how I will be affected by the steps I take in order to stop. I can't predict nose bleeds from wearing the patch. That happened once. I got a sore jaw from the one time I tried nicotine gum. I already related my experiences with anxiety attacks on Zyban/Wellbutrin.

I do know that I have 2 issues to tackle at the same time - adjusting to not smoking itself. The habit cigarettes. And then the addiction component.

I know all the arguments about why NRT isn't a good thing. Best just to get the nicotine out of your body once and for all. I know the success rates are lower than cold turkey with education. Bah. I just want to get this over and done with in the 'easiest' way I can. I just don't know what the easiest way is.

My First Blog Entry - My cat Smokey and quitting smoking

Okay, I'll admit it. The title of this post is really unique, isn't it? Actually given that I've spent the first 37 years of my life having an opinion and I've been online for more than half of my life, it really is amazing that I haven't started a blog before now.

I lie. I actually made 2 previous attempts at starting one. The first was in 2001. I made one entry. In 2003 I made 2. This time, I'm determined to stick it out.

I have a good reason why too.

3 weeks ago Monday Smokey, one of my 7 cats (yes 7!) was diagnosed with oral squamous cell cancer. He was put out of his pain exactly 3 weeks after we found out. Smokey would have been 10 on April 16th. This was way too young for a cat to die. He went too fast. Oral sqamous cell cancer is a nasty form of cancer. I think I've shed more tears since we found out than I have in my entire life to date. I don't want to get into this any further right now. It's been an unbearable couple of days and a very tough few weeks.

I can't do anything to bring Smokey back. I couldn't do anything to stop the progression of the cancer he so valiantly was fighting. But I can do something for me and for my other cats - and that is to quit smoking.

I don't know if my smoking contributed to his cancer. I do know it certainly couldn't have helped. I've made efforts not to smoke around my cats in general. Maybe not as hard of an effort as I should have. I have been dealing with guilt about smoking since Smokey was diagnosed.

I started smoking when I was 16. By my early 20's, I was at a pack a day. (In Canada, packs are 25 cigarettes.) I never understood why. My mother smoked and I used to be a very vocal anti-smoker. I hated the smell. I couldn't understand why people did it. It caused awful illnesses. Yet somehow I managed to start.

Around 30, my smoking increased slightly. I've averaged 30-40 cigarettes a day since then.

I've tried to quit. Many, many times. But something always seems to happen. My last real quitting attempt was a few years ago. I was suffering through it, but I had made it almost to the end of my third month. Then a tax auditor showed up at the door and gave me 2 weeks to get together 4 years of tax records. I continued NOT smoking until the night before the audit. I just couldn't concentrate. I now know that it was a cop-out. Smoking does not help me concentrate. I just wasn't equipped to deal with the stress cigarette-free. I now know that was a cop-out as well.

I've hated smoking since around the age of 29. I mean, I really hated it. I remember the trigger moment for me where this hatred started. I was in a restaurant in Old Montreal with my husband. We were in the smoking section. It was a hot summer night and even as a smoker, the lack of ventilation and smoke in the room were bothering me. A couple walked in. The woman was pregnant. I'm not sure how far along, but she could have been due any time. I got David, my husband, to look at them. I was really surprised at her coming into a stinky smoking section like that to begin with. I was more surprised when I saw the woman light a cigarette up when she sat down. Surprised isn't the word. Shocked. Appalled. Yeah, those words are much better.

The reality of the little nico-demon and the hold it has over smokers really hit me then. Did this woman really want to poison her unborn child with thousands of toxins? How could she do this in public? Didn't she feel shame?

I had a cigarette lit myself when she had lit hers. I stubbed it out. Crumpled up my package. Stopped then. That quit attempt was my first one. I think if I had really thought about quitting prior to that, I might very well have been able to have stayed away from cigarettes. But I had no knowledge at the time about how just one cigarette would get me hooked again.

I won't even begin to guess how many times I've tried to quit since then. Dozens? I know that I always have nicorette and the patch on hand - being prepared for my next attempt. I've tried Zyban and Wellbutrin. Have both sitting in my cabinet too. Zyban worked well for me but I got anxiety attacks while on it (which I never had before starting on it). I think the anxiety attacks were caused by my aversion to taking any type of medication. Irony there for you - I'm more worried about the small potential for side effects of a prescription drug than I am about the effects of smoking!

I've downloaded and started up 'quit meters' more times than I care to think about. I've gone to bed many nights intending on getting up smoke free in the morning.

I have a lot of good reasons to quit. My mom died at 67 after having had a few heart attacks and 2 strokes. Instead of enjoying retirement with my dad, from almost the time she retired, she was sick. The last few years of her life were hell for both her and my dad. I've seen first hand with smoking can do.

I started having problems with my breathing around the age of 30. Had tests done and it turns out I developed a mild case of asthma. (I had mild asthma as a teen, but never had to do anything for it.) The asthma has been worse off and on over the past few years. A late night at the computer with lots of smokes and I wake up being unable to breathe. I start off my morning with the same routine - a cup of coffee, a halls cough drop and a cigarette. I need the cough drop now in order to have my first cigarette of the day. How stupid can you be?

I know that whenever I have been on a quit, I have never had to use my inhaler. Is smoking worth having asthma issues?

I'm worried about emphysema. Really worried. January 2004, I got really sick. Sick to the point that I actually coughed up blood. Gosh, that was awful. I was too sick to smoke, yet as soon as I felt well enough, i started again. Lung cancer scares me as do many other kinds of cancer, but not as much as emphysema.

What does this have to do with Smokey getting oral scc? For the first time in my life, I feel really scared. I saw how fast he progressed with cancer. I've now lived with a living being with aggressive cancer. I don't want that to happen to me. I know that the number one cancer to kill is lung cancer. I know that 90% of people with lung cancer are smokers or former smokers. Most of the rest get it from second-hand smoke. I saw some recent numbers on the odds of a woman today dying of lung cancer. 1 in 18. That includes non-smokers as well. So continuing to smoke, I'm basically looking at 1 in 5-6 odds of dying from lung cancer.

I had a sign yesterday that the timing was right for me. A further reminder. Peter Jennings announced that he had lung cancer. He didn't give details as far as the type of cancer or the stage it is at, but he is starting chemo - which probably means it is far along. He's 66 and apparently stopped smoking just over 20 years ago but started again after 9/11 (permanently? I don't know). Regardless, he DID stop for all that time and he still got lung cancer. That really sucks. You have to wonder how he felt about starting again. If he hadn't, would he have still gotten it? Was the damage from all those years ago?

Sharon